“The long shadow after a difficult past.”
This is the almost poetic title of a recent study describing how Danish, German and Finnish youth, perceive the events of the Second World War.
The study leaves no doubt that they consider the war to be the most important event of the 20th century. However, there are big differences between the 'long shadows' it cast for young people today in each of the three countries, reports ScienceNordic.
“Danish and Finnish youth generally have a narrow, national view of the Second World War. German youth are far more aware of the consequences of the war in the rest of Europe,” says Carsten Yndigegn, associate professor at the Department for Political Science and Public Administration at the University of Southern Denmark, and one of the authors of the new study published in the Journal of Youth Studies, speaking to ScienceNordic.
READ MORE from ScienceNordic: Soviet prisoners of war in Second World War – nameless, until now
The young participants in the study are between 16 and 25 years old and thus many generations removed from the war that ravaged large parts of the world between 1939 and 1945.
Nonetheless, the war is present and meaningful to the young study participants.
“Many of the young people have inherited a memory of the [war] from their family. This is true in Denmark, Germany, and Finland. So many young people are still actively aware of the war,” says Yndigegn.
In Denmark, it is not the Holocaust, the Invasion of Normandy, or the use of atomic weapons in Japan that make the strongest impression.
“Danish youth had a very nationalistic approach to the Second World War. They focused heavily on the resistance movement in Denmark and they expressed a fascination and respect for resistance fighters. In that respect, the Danish youth have a more positive and heroic view of the war than German youth,” says Yndigegn.
READ MORE from ScienceNordic: How Hitler decided to launch the largest bike theft in Denmark's history
The Danish youth's heroic take of the war in many ways reflects the memories of the generations before them, says Anette Warring from Roskilde University. She was not involved in the study but studies collective memories and interpretation of history.
Her own research has shown how a post-war collective memory developed in Denmark. In this narrative, the country was among those resisting Nazi occupation and the resistance fighters are the heroes of the story.
German soldiers salute Danish King Christian X as he rides through occupied Copenhagen. The wartime king's daily rides in the capital were seen by many as an act of defiance. Photo: Unknown/Scanpix Denmark
However, it is almost forgotten how many Danes collaborated with the occupying German forces or even signed up to fight for the Germans, says Warring.
“Young people's view of war largely follows the dominant recollection of the war as we know it from adults. It's a story, where in the war, the resistance movement maintains an unchallenged position as the good guys and the ethical counterbalance to the war ,” she says.
READ MORE from ScienceNordic: Sexual offences increased in Denmark during the Second World War
The collective memory of occupation in Denmark has become more nuanced in recent years, but there were few traces of this among the young people in the study, says Warring.
The common narrative has shifted to include for example, Danish Nazis, those who volunteered for the German war effort and Danish women having intimate relations with the occupying German soldiers.
“For many years they had been marginalised and excluded from the common national memory of the war. But in recent years it has become more nuanced, so that the memory of occupation is not only about the resistance. It's surprising that there is no trace of this among the young people in the study,” says Warring.
Warring is also surprised that neither the Holocaust nor Denmark's collaboration policy with Germany ranks higher in the awareness of the Second World War.
READ MORE from ScienceNordic: Are facts about women in war oversimplified?
Finnish youth also took a very nationalistic approach to the Second World War. In their narrative, Finnish alliance with Nazi countries between 1941 and 1944 was suppressed.
“Finnish youth largely did not think that Finland was originally allied with Germany. Rather they focussed more on the things they considered to be heroic, such as efforts of Finnish veterans in the Winter Wars when Finland fought the Soviet Union,” says Yndigegn.
“Here, the Finnish youth's memories resemble somewhat those of Danish youth, which focus on the positive and heroic side, [while overlooking the] not so positive,” he says.
While both Danish and Finnish youth have a national take on the Second World War, their image of their enemy differs. Danish youth view the Germans as the enemy, while in Finland it is primarily the Soviet Union.
In Germany, the young participants in the survey were well aware that their country bears the responsibility of the war and Nazi crimes.
“German youth are very clear that their country led the world to war, not just in Europe but also beyond. They have no doubt what the Second World War was about. But you also begin to see that young people want to move forward. Many of them expressed that they cannot personally bear the blame for what happened in the past, long before they were born,” says Yndigegn.
In both Germany and Finland, most young people also expressed more trust in the family's story of war than official representations.
German and Finnish youth were sceptical about the version of events recorded in the history books, presented during their school days. They trusted their parents' and grandparents' accounts more.
“We didn't see the same problem in Danish youth who trusted both the family's stories and their school classes,” says Yndigegn.
Both Yndigegn and Warring think that Danish youth accept official representations of the war more easily, since their relationship and understanding of the war is less conflict ridden than in Germany or Finland.
“In Denmark there were many conflicts over the interpretation of the war, including when it comes to the collaboration policy. But it's nothing compared to the dramatically different historical interpretation in Germany and Finland,” says Warring.
“The Danish memory of the German occupation is characterized by more consensus and I think that gives a greater degree of confidence in the official stories of the war,” she says.
This article was originally published on ScienceNordic