SHARE
COPY LINK

FRAUD

Owner of Danish communications giant at forefront of European tax scandal

The leadership of Australian bank MacQuarie, the majority shareholder in Danish telecommunications company TDC, personally approved an avoidance scheme that deprived European countries of billions of euros in tax income.

Owner of Danish communications giant at forefront of European tax scandal
Danish telecommunications firm TDC is owned by Australian bank MacQuarie, which is at the centre of a major alleged tax fraud against a number of European countries. Photo: Mads Claus Rasmussen/Ritzau

Broadcaster DR and 18 other European media investigated papers relating to the case, including internal documents and mails from the bank.

The affair is now being investigated as a fraud.

“There are documents that show clearly how this business model works, and that it was used regularly,” Christoph Spengel, a professor in taxation at the University of Mannheim, told DR.

“The documents were shared between several people at MacQuarie and it is clear there is a sense of confidence in these arrangements not being traceable back to the bank,” Spengel said.

The Australian banking giant has for several years been involved in a network of international banks and law firms specialising in various forms of tax avoidance, DR reports.

Two closely-related tax schemes have helped banks and investors avoid tax or even syphon cash directly out of European treasuries totalling billions more than previously thought, the investigation by DR and 18 fellow media revealed on Thursday.

Complex stock transactions around the days when companies pay out dividends have cost taxpayers as much as 55 billion euros ($63 billion) in lost revenue or outright fraud since 2001, the media investigations found.

The schemes were first uncovered in Germany in 2012, but Thursday’s investigation found evidence of the practices in France, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Denmark, Belgium, Austria, Finland, Norway and Switzerland, AFP writes.

Accounting for the bulk of the total at 46 billion euros, technically legal tax avoidance exploited varying treatment of domestic and foreign shareholders.

Such deals deprived Germany of 24.6 billion euros in tax revenue, France 17 billion and Italy 4.5 billion, according to the investigation led by investigative journalism website Correctiv with big-name outlets like German public broadcaster ARD and French newspaper Le Monde.

Meanwhile, other clearly fraudulent deals drew in more parties in a complex dance around the taxman.

In the deals, stock changes hands so quickly that the tax authorities are unable to identify who is the true owner.

Working together, the investors can claim multiple rebates for tax paid on the dividend and share out the profits amongst themselves — with the treasury footing the bill.

This practice cost Germany 7.2 billion euros, Denmark 1.7 billion and Belgium 201 million, the investigation found.

Since 2012, six criminal investigations have been opened in Germany, including against tax lawyer Hanno Berger and several stock market traders.

Norway's tax authority told AFP that it had uncovered a fraud worth 580,000 Norwegian kroner ($70,533 or 61,304 euros) in 2013 and blocked several later attempts after a warning from Denmark.

The country has since strengthened its surveillance, it added.

Meanwhile, Danish prosecutors have been studying tax practices around dividends since 2015 and are examining “whether there is a basis for criminal proceedings against people or companies involved,” spokesman Simon Gosvig said.

Pierre Moscovici, European Commissioner for economic and financial affairs, tweeted in response to the investigation that European tax authorities should share more information and improve transparency.

“If the fraudsters' imagination is limitless, my determination is as well,” he wrote.

READ ALSO: Nordea reported to Denmark investigators over money laundering

MORTGAGE

Can you really get paid for borrowing money in Denmark?

Last week, the Realkredit Denmark financial institution paid, for the first time, negative interest to a customer—meaning the customer was effectively paid for taking out a mortgage.

Can you really get paid for borrowing money in Denmark?
File photo: Kasper Palsnov / Ritzau Scanpix

Negative interest results in the customer effectively being paid by the lender to borrow money, or that they pay back less than they have loaned.

On Monday, the phenomenon was showing signs of spreading elsewhere in the country’s financial sector.

Homeowners who have taken out a certain type of loan known as an F5 loan, with which up to 40 percent of the house’s value can be borrowed, can, with Monday’s interest levels, find themselves paying minus 6 kroner per month to borrow 1 million kroner.

Interest on F5 loans is currently at -0.56 percent, with the repayment rate 0.55 percent. Those terms mean homeowners can be given money for borrowing money.

While last week’s negative interest mortgages were the result of a specific set of contributory circumstances, a larger group of borrowers could benefit this time, according to Christian Helligsøe Heinig, Realkredit Denmark’s head economist.

READ ALSO: Lender to launch Denmark's cheapest ever mortgage

“It will typically be homeowners in the senior age group, who think they have repaid enough and want to make their daily lives sweeter, who will be looking towards flexible repayment and F5 loans,” Heinig said.

Around 1 in 4 of homeowners borrowing from Realkredit Denmark have a loan-to-value ration of a maximum of 40 percent, he said.

But the situation is an “absurdity” that breaks with economic wisdom, he added.

It is partly caused by a flooding on the market of money available for investment, he said.

That is related to attempts made by central banks to stimulate the economy by increasing the amount that can be borrowed for investment in projects that can benefit society in an economic sense.

Another reason is the growing size of private savings, he said.

“In all cases, it is important to be clear that the opportunity to make money by borrowing money should not tempt ordinary members of the public to throw themselves into investments using borrowed money,” the economist said.

“There’s no such thing as a ‘free lunch’ in the current financial climate,” he said.

READ ALSO: What you need to know when buying a home as a foreigner in Denmark

SHOW COMMENTS