Danish minister: EU ruling would have left Europe “wide open”

Danish immigration minister Inger Støjberg says that, had the EU not ruled in favour of Belgium in a recent visa case, an increased flow of immigration would have been likely.

Danish minister: EU ruling would have left Europe “wide open”
Danish immigration minister Inger Støjberg. File photo: Ólafur Steinar Gestsson/Scanpix

The European Court ruled that Belgium was not obliged to issue visas to a Syrian family that wanted to apply for asylum there.

The outcome of the case was a fortunate one for EU countries wanting to restrict numbers of refugee arrivals, Støjberg said.

“The consequences could have been unimaginable if the EU Court had decided that we should be obliged to issue visas for the purpose of travelling to a country to claim asylum,” the minister said in a written statement, reports news agency Ritzau.

A Syrian couple with three children applied for visas at the Belgian embassy in the Lebanese capital Beirut, where they clearly stated that they intended to claim asylum, reports Ritzau.

After the family returned to their hometown of Aleppo, the application was rejected on the grounds that they had intended to stay in Belgium for longer than the 90-day validity of the visa.

“It would have left the doors to Europe wide open, thereby directly counteracting the measures we have taken to control the flow of people to Denmark,” said Støjberg.

Martin Henriksen, immigration spokesperson for the nationalist Danish People’s Party (DF), was also in favour of the outcome, but said that the ruling would unlikely have had a serious effect on Denmark due to the exemption right regarding EU law that Denmark voted to retain in a December 2015 referendum.

“It would have meant that many people would have had the chance to come to the EU and applied for asylum. That would obviously also affect Denmark on some level,” Henriksen told Ritzau.


Denmark suspends asylum centre talks with Rwanda

Denmark now aims to work with other EU countries to transfer asylum seekers to centres outside Europe and has suspended talks with Rwanda as it no longer plans to go it alone, its migration minister said on Wednesday.

Denmark suspends asylum centre talks with Rwanda

The Scandinavian country’s plans, first announced by the previous Social Democratic government, called for people seeking asylum in Denmark to be transferred to reception centres outside the European Union while their requests were processed.

A law adopted in June 2021 did not specify which country would host the centre, but said asylum seekers should stay there even after they were granted refugee status.

Discussions were launched with Rwanda and other countries, but they have now been suspended since the installation of a new Danish left-right government in December headed by the Social Democrats.

“We are not holding any negotiations at the moment about the establishment of a Danish reception centre in Rwanda”, Migration and Integration Minister Kaare Dybvad told daily Altinget.

“This is a new government. We still have the same ambition, but we have a different process”, he added. “The new government’s programme calls for the establishment of a reception centre outside Europe “in cooperation with the EU or a number of other countries”.

The change is an about-face for the Social Democrats, which had until now rejected any European collaboration, judging it slow and thorny.

“While the wider approach also makes sense to us, [Denmark’s change of heart] is precisely because there has been movement on the issue among many European countries”, Dybvad said. “There are many now pushing for a stricter asylum policy in Europe”, he said.


Inger Støjberg, leader of the Denmark Democrats said on Facebook that she was “honestly disgusted” by the government’s decision to delay plans for a reception centre in Rwanda, pointing out that Kaare Dybvad had said during the election campaign that a deal would be done with Rwanda within a year. 

“Call us old-fashioned, but we say the same thing both before and after an election. We stand firm on a strict immigration policy. The Social Democrats, Liberals and Moderates clearly do not,” she said. 

Lars Boje Mathiesen from the New Right Party accused the government of perpetrating a “deadly fraud” on the Danish people. 

“It is said in Christiansborg that it is paused. But we all know what that means,” he wrote on Facebook, accusing Danish prime minister Mette Frederiksen of “empty words” in the run-up to the election. 

In the face of this reaction, Dybvad told the Ritzau newswire that although talks with Rwanda were not happening at present, the government had not given up on a deal with the African nation. He also said that he was confident that asylum reception centres outside of the EU would be a reality within five years.

EU interior ministers are meeting in Stockholm this week to discuss asylum reform. Those talks are expected to focus on how to speed up the process of returning undocumented migrants to their country of origin in cases where their asylum bid fails.

Denmark’s immigration policy has been influenced by the far-right for more than 20 years. Even Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, the head of the Social Democrats, has pursued a “zero refugee” policy since coming to power in 2019.

Copenhagen has over the years implemented a slew of initiatives to discourage migrants and made Danish citizenship harder to obtain. In 2020, it became the only country in Europe to withdraw residency permits from Syrians from Damascus, judging that the situation there was now safe enough for them to return.