Danes reject EU justice rules in referendum

Author thumbnail
AFP/The Local - [email protected]
Danes reject EU justice rules in referendum
PM Lars Løkke Rasmussen held a late night press conference after his 'yes' camp suffered a clear defeat. Photo: Søren Bidstrup/Scanpix

Voters in eurosceptic EU member Denmark on Thursday solidly rejected a government proposal to beef up their participation in the bloc's justice cooperation.


In Denmark's referendum to replace its opt-out on EU justice and home affairs with an 'opt-in' model, the 'No' side received 53.1 percent of votes, while the 'Yes' camp garnered 46.9 percent, final results showed. Voter turnout stood at 72 percent.
With the ‘no’ vote, Denmark may now have to leave the EU's law enforcement agency Europol, which tackles organized crime, trafficking and terrorism.
Denmark does not fully participate in the EU's justice and home affairs policies after Danish voters rejected the Maastricht Treaty in 1992.
Copenhagen was granted opt-outs on several EU policy areas including justice, and Danes subsequently said 'yes' to Maastricht a year later. But the exemptions mean Denmark is unable to stay in Europol when the legal status of the EU agency changes, as is expected next year.
'More EU? No thanks'
The referendum – which had been described as so complex that it “makes the voters' eyes glaze over” – boiled down to whether Denmark should replace its current blanket opt-out of EU justice rules with the kind of model used by Britain and Ireland, which choose whether or not to participate in some areas of EU policy on a case-by-case basis.
The 'no' side was led by the anti-EU, anti-immigration Danish People's Party (DF) which argued that dropping the justice opt-out would give too much power to Brussels.
As he left a polling station in Copenhagen, pensioner Niels Engelsted said he and wife Bette had voted 'no'.
"They have packed so many things together in that proposal. They talk to the population as if we were idiots," he said.
Esben Trier, a 48-year-old consultant, said he had voted 'yes' despite "a long list" of things he didn't like about the EU.
"It's like other relationships - you have to compromise," he said.
Opponents of the referendum have argued that Denmark can negotiate a separate agreement to stay in Europol, something the ‘yes’ side argued is neither certain nor simple. Some have estimated it could take up to five years to make a parallel agreement. 
Refugee fears
DF was able to tap into fears that Denmark could be forced to accept obligatory EU refugee quotas as Europe struggles to cope with a massive influx of people fleeing conflict and poverty in the Middle East, Africa and South Asia.
Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen had vowed that Denmark would remain outside of the EU’s asylum rules and promised Danes that another referendum would be called before Copenhagen would latch on to European policies in the area. 
Denmark has some of Europe's strictest immigration policies and has received far fewer asylum seekers this year than neighbouring Sweden or Germany.
Rasmussen's right-wing government and four other political parties – including primary opposition party the Social Democrats – said that a ’yes' vote is the best way to ensure Denmark stays in Europol, helping Danish police fight violent extremism and other cross-border crime.
It also wanted to adopt 22 EU laws on issues including cybercrime and debt recovery.
Some voters said they voted 'no' because they struggled to understand what the referendum was about.
Marlene Wind, a political science professor at the University of Copenhagen, said the 'yes' side was focusing too much on technicalities and regulations.
"Many people I've talked to say they feel completely intimidated," she told AFP.
By contrast, DF had boiled down its message on campaign posters to: "More EU? No thanks."
DF's campaign poster. Photo: Nils Meilvang/Scanpix
DF's campaign poster. Photo: Nils Meilvang/Scanpix



Join the conversation in our comments section below. Share your own views and experience and if you have a question or suggestion for our journalists then email us at [email protected].
Please keep comments civil, constructive and on topic – and make sure to read our terms of use before getting involved.

Please log in to leave a comment.

See Also