Eurovision cost three times more than planned

Organisers of the Eurovision song contest budgeted 34.6 million kroner but spent 112 million. An expert told The Local that he expects a "bloodbath" after such "disastrous management".

Eurovision cost three times more than planned
It cost 112 million kroner to pave the way for Conchita Wurst's stardom. Photo: Keld Navntoft/Scanpix
The final budget figures for May’s Eurovision contest in Copenhagen were released on Monday, showing that the show cost more than three times as much as planned. 
The total bill for Eurovision came to 112 million kroner ($20.2 million), well over the initial 34.6 million kroner ($6.2 million). 
It was already revealed in June that Projektselskabet, a temporary company created by publicly-owned tourist organisation Wonderful Copenhagen to put on the Eurovision bonanza, completely overshot its budget. 
Projektselskabet admitted that it had gone “considerably over budget” but stressed that judgement should be withheld until the release of the final figures. 
When those numbers were released on Monday, they revealed a total deficit of 58 million kroner ($10.4 million). That loss will now have to be covered by Copenhagen Council, the Capital Region (Region Hovedstaden), Wonderful Copenhagen and Refshaleøens Ejendomsselskab A/S. 
Organisers sad on Monday that the refurbishing of the former ship-building halls B&W Hallerne in an industrial area on Copenhagen’s Refshaleøen island cost much more than they anticipated. 
“Over 90 percent of the extra costs went to repurposing B&W Hallerne. It was much, much more expensive than anyone would have imagined,” Wonderful Copenhagen spokesman Lars Benhard Jørgensen told Danmarks Radio. 
Jørgensen’s statement, however, seems questionable given that concerns about the costs were raised as far back as September 2013, when B&W Hallerne was selected as the site of Eurovision. 
Fabian Holt, an associate producer at Roskilde University who has done extensive research in live events and venues, said that the budget numbers clearly demonstrate “disastrous management”.
“There is no doubt that the city of Copenhagen and the organisations behind the partnership to produce Eurovision were very eager to make this happen. They seem to have been so seduced by the thought of holding a magical event that they forgot to ask critical questions about how realistic the plans and production were,” Holt told The Local. 
Holt predicted that someone would be held ultimately responsible and that Jørgensen’s statement that no one could have imagined the costs show that he and his organisation are already on the defensive. 
“I think he knows that this won’t be the end of it. I think that the city and regional politicians will get to the bottom of what happened and there will be consequences,” Holt said. 
Holt added that despite a potential “bloodbath” resulting from the final figures, it’s still too early to say if the excessive Eurovision spending is as bad as it seems. 
“Going three times over the budget is a clear sign of disastrous management, but overall the event wasn’t a disaster. Yes, it cost a lot more than it should have, but the positive effects are still there. Some of those benefits can be measured directly, while others like city branding cannot be measured yet.” 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.


Is Denmark’s Eurovision entry a rip-off?

Danes on Friday night voted for the song they wanted to represent them at this summer’s Eurovision contest. But before the euphoria even wore off, the winning entry was accused of being a rip-off of a smash hit German pop song.

Is Denmark's Eurovision entry a rip-off?
Lighthouse X will represent Denmark at Eurovision with the song 'Soldiers of Love'. Photo: Henning Bagger/Scanpix
The Danish trio Lighthouse X won Friday’s Melodi Grand Prix with the song ‘Soldiers of Love’. With 42 percent of viewers’ votes, the winners should have spent the next few days basking in glory before preparing to represent the nation in Stockholm this summer.
Instead, social media users began pointing out that the song performed by Johannes Nymark, Søren Bregendal and Martin Skriver sounded an awful lot like German pop superstar Helene Fischer’s ‘Atemlos durch die Nacht’ hit from 2013. 
Lighthouse X flatly denies being inspired by the German track. 
“We are not, because none of us know that song,” the group told tabloid BT. 
Two music experts came to the Danish group’s defence – sort of. 
Producer Chief 1 acknowledged that the two songs sound familiar but said it was likely “just a coincidence”. 
“We don’t have so many tones in the pop palette, so you can’t avoid touching on something else in this universe,” he told TV2. “I really don’t think the people behind this song sit around listening to bad German schlager to find inspiration.” 
The head of the official Melodi Grand Prix fan club also said the two songs are very similar but not close enough to qualify as pure plagiarism. 
“I’ll admit that when you hear Helene Fischer’s song, the chorus sounds a lot like the Danish winning song. But otherwise the songs are quite different and I have a hard time believing that EBU [the European Broadcasting Union, which produces the Eurovision Song Contest, ed.] would threaten to disqualify it based on this,” Johann Sørensen said. 
So, is the Danish song a rip-off of the German? Listen to them both below and judge for yourself.